By early morning, Heathrow lost its primary power supply, forcing a complete shutdown of airport operations for a full day. Estimates of the daily financial losses reached approximately £20 million (€23.9m). Experts projected that the total economic impact on airlines and the broader UK economy could amount to hundreds of millions of pounds. A conservative estimate placed the loss of tourism revenue for the UK at £4.8 million per day.
The disruption had global ripple effects as flights were diverted or cancelled and tens of thousands of passengers were stranded. This article will examine the technical causes of the substation fire, the cascading impacts on the energy network and airport.
Heathrow's Chief Executive Officer, Thomas Woldbye stated that although the airport's backup power systems activated correctly during the outage; they were not designed to sustain operations across the entire airport. While the backup generators successfully maintained critical functions. They fell short of supporting the full range of airport activities. Each substation supplying Heathrow is reportedly fitted with its own backup transformer; however, during this incident, the backup transformer at the North Hyde substation also failed.
Notably, the Chief Executive of the National Grid, John Pettigrew, the UK's electricity transmission operator, offered a differing account. He claimed that Heathrow had two alternative substations available, both capable of fully meeting the airport's power requirements during the disruption. This discrepancy highlights uncertainties regarding the airport’s actual redundancy measures and suggests potential communication issues between Heathrow and its energy provider.
We will distil 10 technical lessons for large-scale energy clients, focusing on resilience, real-time network visibility, contingency planning, and infrastructure design.
Preliminary investigations point to an internal fault in a high-voltage transformer at the North Hyde substation as the trigger. Initial reports suggest an electrical fault developed within an oil-filled transformer, involving a voltage transformer or its on-load tap changer. The failure caused extensive arcing (“sparking”), which ignited the transformer’s oil coolant, leading to an explosion and large blaze. Oil-filled transformers carry inherent fire risk because once oil insulation is compromised (due to overheating, insulation breakdown, or a short-circuit), it can vaporise and ignite under electrical arc. Such transformer fires are rare but not unheard of, often stemming from a combination of factors – e.g. insulation aging, thermal stress, or mechanical failure – that culminate in a catastrophic fault. In this case, forensic analysis will focus on the transformer's operating records and maintenance history, including whether any oil leaks or degradation were known and if the tap changer was in operation at the time. The London Fire Brigade confirmed no evidence of foul play, indicating the cause was technical and not sabotage.
The substation’s design and condition are also under scrutiny. North Hyde is a major Grid Supply Point (GSP) where the national transmission network (400 kV/275 kV) feeds into the regional distribution system. It contains multiple large transformers to step high voltage down (likely to 132 kV or 66 kV) for local distribution. On the night of the fire, three transformers were in place: one was destroyed by fire, a second adjacent unit suffered heat damage, and the third was taken offline as a precaution while firefighters battled the blaze. Such substations are typically engineered with fire barriers and protection systems, yet the intensity of this fire overwhelmed on-site protections. Firefighters faced a “hydrocarbon fire” fuelled by transformer oil – akin to an oil refinery blaze – with live high-voltage equipment posing additional hazards. It required specialised foam and cooling operations to contain. About 70 firefighters and 10 engines responded, and a major incident was declared within an hour of the first emergency call. By mid-afternoon on 21 March, the fire was finally reduced to a few hotspots.
Investigators will examine if any protective relays or failsafe malfunctioned. Normally, sensors should detect transformer faults and trigger rapid disconnection (and fire suppression systems where available) to limit damage. The Electricity at Work Regulations 1989 mandate regular maintenance and testing of such equipment. Heathrow’s substation would have undergone thermal imaging inspections and oil sampling as part of routine maintenance. Despite these precautions, the event demonstrates how an undetected latent defect – for example, deteriorated insulation or a stuck switch – can escalate into a fire. “It is very unusual for one incident to cause the entire shutdown of an entire site like Heathrow,” noted Mark Coles of the IET. The rarity underscores why every aspect of the failed transformer – from manufacturing records to recent performance – is being examined to pinpoint root cause.
Major incidents like this offer valuable insights for large-scale energy clients and infrastructure operators. Below are 10 technical lessons drawn from the Heathrow outage, aiming to bolster your business’ network resilience, real-time visibility, and contingency planning: